Friday, October 16, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Friday, October 16, 2026 Admin

GLDR.CN ·

Golden Rapture Mining Identifies Strong Linear Anomalies throughout the Project Area from Airborne Magnetic Survey

Exploration Programs Sampling & Geoscience Results

Golden Rapture Mining Iden�fies Strong Linear Anomalies throughout the Project Area from Airborne Magne�c Survey

Edmonton, Alberta, May 28, 2025. Golden Rapture Mining Corpora�on (CSE-GLDR) is pleased to announce the results of the recently completed low-al�tude, high-resolu�on drone magne�c surveys of its 100% owned 10,000+ acre Phillips Gold Project, Rainy River District, Ontario.

The (UAV) airborne magne�cs survey was conducted by Rosor Explora�on of Burlington, Ontario. It was flown at a height of 50 meters with a MagArrow magnetometer by Geometrics suspended from a Matrice 300 RTK drone along 50-meter spaced lines with a total of 313 linekilometers covering an area of approximately 16.7 km2 in size.

The results iden�fied new high-priority targets, confirming that the survey area is dominated by strong linear anomalies throughout the project area, with the strongest occurring in the northeast corner.

It was also noted by Rosor Explora�on in their report that there is intense deforma�on and folding in the eastern part of the survey area.

Figure 1. Map of property showing survey border area in green

New High-Priority Explora�on Targets Discovered

Richard Rivet said:

“To our surprise, strong linear anomalies were found throughout the project area, with the strongest occurring in the northeast corner and not from the Combined Mine area itself, where all the drilling has occurred so far with great results as high as 285.00 g/t Au.”

These significant anomalies trend E-W in the southwest corner before trending NE-SW to the northeast and range in amplitude from 250-100 nT, with the strongest anomalies localized in a 1 km band from 426730 E 5454600N to 428175 E 5456650 N. The maximum along this belt is located near the centre of the survey area (427130 E 5455120 N) with an amplitude of 1,800 nT.

Figure 2. Drone Magne�c survey map (total magne�c intensity – reduced to pole)

There are weakly magne�c N-S trending linear anomalies located in the middle of the survey area. Of importance is that these are overprinted by the stronger magne�c anomalies seen in the figures, implying that they are from a previous deforma�on event.

There is a clear contrast on the eastern edge of the survey between the magne�cally strong belt and a strong magne�c low, which is likely the boundary between the felsic volcanics to the east and the mafic volcanics that dominate the survey area.

Figure 3. Image of the drone magne�c survey (First ver�cal deriva�ve)

Inversion Modelling

Unconstrained magne�c inversion models were prepared for the survey area. Inversion modelling was conducted with the Geoso� VOXI Earth Modelling so�ware in Oasis Montaj v2023.2. The process produces three-dimensional physical property distribu�on models of magne�c suscep�bility and vector magne�za�on direc�on.

Results show that horizontal magne�c suscep�bility slices at various depths ranging from 200 m to 1000 m depth are also included in the data delivery. Below approximately 1000 m depth, merge related artefacts begin to become evident due to the longer wavelength components of each model.

Of great importance is that the suscep�bility inversion results show the separate magne�c highs as surface expressions of an impressively larger magne�c body at a 600 m depth.

The model with 0.03 SI isosurface is shown in Figure 4 below

Source of all Survey Data

Phillips Project Survey Processing Report: Authored by: Skyler Mallozzi, M.Sc, P.Geo, Senior Geophysicist, Rosor Exploration, April 24, 2025.

Qualified Person

The technical and scientific information in this news release has been reviewed and approved by John Archibald, P.Geo., Exploration Manager of Golden Rapture, who is a Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101.

Surface Sampling Program to Commence

Richard Rivet said:

“We are excited that the resul�ng dataset shows many high-priority magne�cally ac�ve areas in many parts of the property. It is now recommended that a prospec�ng and surface sampling program commence immediately to inves�gate and test the rocks where the new stronger anomalies have been iden�fied.”

About Golden Rapture Mining Corporation

Golden Rapture Mining is a newly listed exploration company engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of high-potential assets. The company’s Phillips Township Property is located in the Rainy River District of NW Ontario. It is comprised of 10,000+ acres of highly prospective past-producing high-grade gold systems with a total of 18 mine shafts on the property.

Golden Rapture has now been listed for over 1 year with 37,469,390 shares presently issued.

On behalf of the Board Richard Rivet, Chief Executive Officer Email: [email protected] Phone: 780-729-5395 For more info, please look at our website at https://goldenrapturemining.com

Forward-looking statements include predictions, projections, and forecasts and are often, but not always, identified by the use of words such as “seek”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “plan”, “estimate”, “forecast”, “expect”, “potential”, “project”, “target”, “schedule”, “budget” and “intend” and statements that an event or result “may”, “will”, “should”, “could” or “might” occur or be achieved and other similar expressions and includes the negatives thereof. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this release, including, without limitation, statements regarding the Company’s planned exploration programs and drill programs and potential significance of results are forward-looking statements that involve various risks and uncertainties. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Forward-looking statements are based on a number of material factors and assumptions. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from Company’s expectations include actual exploration results, changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined, results of future resource estimates, future metal prices, availability of capital, and financing on acceptable terms, general economic, market or business conditions, uninsured risks, regulatory changes, defects in title, availability of personnel, materials, and equipment on a timely basis, accidents or equipment breakdowns, delays in receiving government approvals, unanticipated environmental impacts on operations and costs to remedy same, and other exploration or other risks detailed herein and from time to time in the filings made by the Company with securities regulators. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events, or results to differ from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause such actions, events, or results to differ materially from those anticipated. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, and accordingly readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.